China’s technocratic surveillance state, brought to you by American Big Tech and designed for global application

China was testing ground for system of total-information awareness, where all movement, all purchases, all speech, and ultimately all thoughts occur under wary eye of gov't with its Big Tech partners.

Daniel Corvell has an excellent analysis of the U.S.-China collaboration on what amounts to the creation of a coming globalized surveillance state. Of course it all hinges on countries adopting biometric digital IDs, tied to our bank accounts and tokenization. Once that’s in place, it’s game over for freedom. Below is an excerpt from the article, at The Conservative Playbook, which is a must read for understanding the symbiotic relationship between communist China, Silicon Valley, and “democratic” Washington.

China’s surveillance regime is often depicted as a uniquely authoritarian system — a dystopian fusion of cameras, algorithms, and totalitarian ambition. But a growing body of evidence shows that the foundation of Beijing’s digital panopticon was not built in isolation. It was quietly funded, equipped, and technologically enabled by the very institutions that claim to defend freedom: American corporations and the U.S. government.

According to a recent report by the NGO C4ADS and the Intercept, American tech giants and defense-linked suppliers have been directly feeding China’s expanding surveillance apparatus through sophisticated biometric, semiconductor, and AI technologies.

The report maps out how dozens of U.S. companies, some operating through intermediaries or “shell” distributors, have supplied the Chinese Communist Party’s surveillance infrastructure — from facial recognition components to data-processing software that powers state monitoring of its 1.4 billion citizens.

At the center of this web are biometric technologies — tools that scan faces, track movements, and identify individuals in real time. Many of these systems were originally designed for security or retail analytics but have been absorbed into China’s “public safety” network, a euphemism for omnipresent state surveillance. In regions such as Xinjiang, these tools have been weaponized to monitor and detain Uyghur Muslims, tracking everything from gait patterns to smartphone activity. But the scandal is not only what China has done with the technology — it’s how easily American firms helped make it possible.

Researchers discovered that many U.S. suppliers, including major chipmakers and sensor producers, continued selling hardware and software to Chinese entities long after Washington imposed export restrictions. They did so indirectly — by routing shipments through subsidiaries or rebranding products under “neutral” names. Some contracts were even facilitated through government-backed programs encouraging “U.S.-China technological collaboration,” showing that the American national security establishment has, at times, spoken out of both sides of its mouth.

It is a hypocrisy that runs deep. Publicly, Washington condemns Beijing’s human rights abuses and warns about “digital authoritarianism.” Privately, many agencies and corporations have viewed China as too profitable to restrain. The result is a moral paradox: American taxpayers fund defense and intelligence programs to “counter Chinese influence” while their own technology firms supply the infrastructure for the CCP’s surveillance state.

Unfortunately, it’s far worse than just hypocrisy that’s affecting the Chinese people. The same tech deployed in China is quickly integrating with America’s burgeoning Surveillance Industrial Complex. It’s as if they’re testing it in a known authoritarian state ahead of becoming our own authoritarian state.

To understand how this happened, one must look back at decades of quiet cooperation. In the early 2000s, when China joined the World Trade Organization, Western corporations rushed to tap its market potential. Tech companies — from cloud computing to microchip producers — saw an opportunity to dominate a rapidly modernizing economy. With little oversight, they began exporting not only goods but also expertise. American universities trained thousands of Chinese engineers, many of whom returned home to lead surveillance and AI development projects. U.S. investors poured billions into Chinese startups now directly tied to the Ministry of Public Security.

These same surveillance technologies are now being refined and exported abroad through China’s “Digital Silk Road” initiative — spreading the CCP’s model of data-driven governance to Africa, the Middle East, and Latin America. In effect, the West’s technological seed money helped grow a global surveillance ecosystem that threatens not only privacy but sovereignty itself.

Even more troubling is that the line between “their surveillance” and “ours” is blurring. The same biometric and AI firms collaborating with Chinese entities have contracts with U.S. law enforcement, intelligence agencies, and private security companies. The architecture of total control — cameras, databases, predictive analytics — is becoming a transnational system of social management. Beijing may be perfecting it, but Washington is replicating it.

There is a spiritual dimension to all of this that cannot be ignored. A world where human beings are constantly tracked, profiled, and ranked is not merely a political experiment — it is a manifestation of the deeper drive toward global control. In biblical terms, it resembles the infrastructure of the Beast: a system where freedom and individuality are subjugated to omnipresent surveillance in the name of “safety” and “efficiency.” The merging of government, corporate, and technological power is the essence of technocracy — and both East and West are playing their roles.

For Americans, the question is no longer whether China is watching its citizens. It’s whether we’re allowing the same forces — under different names — to watch us. Every facial recognition upgrade, every biometric convenience, every AI-powered camera on a street corner brings us one step closer to a world where privacy is not a right but a relic.

Read the entire article here.